United States Sixth Circuit

Denial of petitioner's motion to reopen removal proceedings due to ineffective assistance of counsel is affirmed where denial of an opportunity to remain in the country while awaiting the outcome of his appeal did not constitute a denial of due process, and there was no abuse of discretion in the denial.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/20/2006
• Published 01/20/2006

Judges

• BOGGS, Chief Judge., Before:  BOGGS, Chief Judge;  GIBBONS, Circuit Judge;  and ROSE, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ON BRIEF:  Alan M. Anzarouth, San Diego, California, for Petitioner.  Ethan B. Kanter, Michael P. Lindemann, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.