United States Sixth Circuit

Order denying plaintiffs'-parents motion for leave to amend their complaint and granting defendants' motions to dismiss in a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 civil rights case against defendants, a hospital, social workers, and a county, is affirmed where plaintiffs failed to state a claim and there was no error in denying leave to amend.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/18/2006
• Published 01/18/2006

Judges

• Before:  MERRITT, MARTIN, and COLE, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  John H. Metz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellants.  James A. Comodeca, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, Mark C. Vollman, Michael G. Florez, Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellees.   ON BRIEF:  John H. Metz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellants.   James A. Comodeca, Mark L. Silbersack, Margaret Maggio, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, Mark C. Vollman, Michael G. Florez, Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellees.