United States Sixth Circuit

Judgment in a case involving defendant's, a former public defender, refusal to respond to grand jury interrogatories on attorney-client privilege grounds is vacated where the district court erred in concluding that the expiration of defendant's first grand jury term and issuance of a new subpoena resulted in a second, removable action.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/10/2006
• Published 01/10/2006

Judges

• Before:  DAUGHTREY and COLE, Circuit Judges;  BARZILAY, Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  S. Adele Shank, Law Office of S. Adele Shank, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant.  Carley J. Ingram, Office of the Prosecutor, Dayton, Ohio, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  S. Adele Shank, Law Office of S. Adele Shank, Columbus, Ohio, Lawrence J. Greger, Dayton, Ohio, for Appellant.   Carley J. Ingram, John A. Cumming, Office of the Prosecutor, Dayton, Ohio, for Appellee.