United States Sixth Circuit

Summary judgment for defendant-insurer in a dispute connected with the purchase of certain annuity contracts from defendant is affirmed over plaintiff's claims of errors regarding findings on an agency relationship between defendants, the handling of plaintiff's expert's opinion, and the disposition of certain motions.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/28/2005
• Published 12/28/2005

Judges

• Before:  MARTIN, GIBBONS, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Christopher M. DeVito, Morganstern, MacAdams & DeVito, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellants.  Joseph Serino, Jr., Kirkland & Ellis, New York, New York, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Christopher M. DeVito, Morganstern, MacAdams & DeVito, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellants.  Joseph Serino, Jr., Matthew Solum, Kirkland & Ellis, New York, New York, Arthur M. Kaufman, Erica L. Calderas, Hahn, Loeser & Parks, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.