United States Sixth Circuit

Denial of declaratory judgment and a finding that the defendant was covered under plaintiff's commercial general liability insurance policy is affirmed where plaintiff's argument that defendant's claim of coverage for losses arising out of a train derailment fell under a "products completed operations hazard" exclusion was meritless.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/21/2005
• Published 12/21/2005

Judges

• Before:  KEITH and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges;  OBERDORFER, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Mary Jo Boerman, Bigler, Berry, Johnston, Sztykiel & Hunt, Zeeland, Michigan, for Appellant.  Douglas J. Fryer, Dykema Gossett, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, Daniel R. Rustmann, Butzel Long, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellees.   ON BRIEF:  Mary Jo Boerman, Bigler, Berry, Johnston, Sztykiel & Hunt, Zeeland, Michigan, for Appellant.  Douglas J. Fryer, Dykema Gossett, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, Daniel R. Rustmann, Butzel Long, Detroit, Michigan, Kimberly H. Allen, Butzel Long, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, Mary C. O'Donnell, Durkin, McDonnell, Clifton, Davis & O'Donnell, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellees.