United States Sixth Circuit

Summary judgment for county defendant on civil rights claims brought by health care providers regarding defendant's distribution of public funds for provision of indigent health care services is affirmed where there was no due process or equal protection violation by defendant.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/14/2005
• Published 12/14/2005

Judges

• Before:  DAUGHTREY, MOORE, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Richard A. Cordray, Grove City, Ohio, for Appellants.   Ted T. Martin, Baker & Hostetler, LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellees.   ON BRIEF:  Richard A. Cordray, Grove City, Ohio, Timothy M. Burke, Manley & Burke, Cincinnati, Ohio, John A. West, William T. Robinson, III, Rhonda S. Frey, Greenebaum, Doll & McDonald, Covington, Kentucky, for Appellants.  Ted T. Martin, Baker & Hostetler, LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, Christian J. Schaefer, Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office, Cincinnati, Ohio, Brian G. Dershaw, Sidney Weil, Beckman, Weil, Shepardson, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellees.