United States Sixth Circuit
Diamond v. State of Michigan, 04-2327
Summary judgment for defendant, a state rehabilitation services agency, is affirmed where defendant's actions in connection with the termination of services provided for plaintiff did not violate the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. section 720 et seq.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/13/2005
- Published 12/13/2005
Judges
- Before: GILMAN and COOK, Circuit Judges; CARR, Chief District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ON BRIEF: Matthew H. Rick, Office of the Attorney General Economic Development & Retirement Division, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee. Sharon P. Diamond, Haslett, Michigan, pro se.