United States Sixth Circuit

Summary judgment against the government's claim that defendant violated the Clayton Act is reversed where the district court erred in failing to consider whether defendant's original acquisition agreement had anticompetitive effects on the market for school milk.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/25/2005
• Published 10/25/2005

Judges

• Before:  CLAY, GILMAN, and COOK, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Robert B. Nicholson, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellants.  W. Todd Miller, Baker & Miller, Washington, D.C., Charles E. Shivel, Jr., Stoll, Keenon & Park, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellees.   ON BRIEF:  Robert B. Nicholson, James J. Fredricks, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., David Vandeventer, Office of the Attorney General, Frankfort, Kentucky, for Appellants.  W. Todd Miller, Donald I. Baker, Kyle G. Manikas, Baker & Miller, Washington, D.C., Charles E. Shivel, Jr., Lizbeth A. Tully, Anthony J. Phelps, Stoll, Keenon & Park, Lexington, Kentucky, Bobby R. Burchfield, McDermott, Will & Emery, Washington, D.C., David A. Owen, Brian M. Johnson, Theodore R. Martin, Greenebaum, Doll & McDonald, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellees.