United States Sixth Circuit
Pollard v. E.E. DuPont, 03-6611, 03-6612
In a wrongful discharge case, the district court did not err in concluding that defendant was liable for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress under Tennessee law.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/29/2005
- Published 06/29/2005
Judges
- Before: KEITH, MERRITT, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Raymond Michael Ripple, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Wilmington, Delaware, for Appellant. Kathleen L. Caldwell, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Raymond Michael Ripple, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Wilmington, Delaware, Stephen D. Goodwin, Maurice Wexler, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant. Kathleen L. Caldwell, Memphis, Tennessee, Samuel J. Muldavin, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.