Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Sixth Circuit


Pollard v. E.E. DuPont, 03-6611, 03-6612

In a wrongful discharge case, the district court did not err in concluding that defendant was liable for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress under Tennessee law.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/29/2005
  • Published 06/29/2005

Judges

  • Before:  KEITH, MERRITT, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Raymond Michael Ripple, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Wilmington, Delaware, for Appellant.  Kathleen L. Caldwell, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Raymond Michael Ripple, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Wilmington, Delaware, Stephen D. Goodwin, Maurice Wexler, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant.  Kathleen L. Caldwell, Memphis, Tennessee, Samuel J. Muldavin, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard