Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


Siggers-El v. Barlow, 03-2291

In a constitutional retaliation claim, defendant is not entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law since he knew or should have known of the constitutionally violative effect of his actions.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/24/2005
  • Published 06/24/2005

Judges

  • Before:  KENNEDY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges;  HOOD, Chief District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED: Kevin R. Himebaugh, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellant. Paul D. Reingold, Michigan Clinical Law Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Kevin R. Himebaugh, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellant. Paul D. Reingold, Michigan Clinical Law Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard