United States Sixth Circuit
Siggers-El v. Barlow, 03-2291
In a constitutional retaliation claim, defendant is not entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law since he knew or should have known of the constitutionally violative effect of his actions.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/24/2005
- Published 06/24/2005
Judges
- Before: KENNEDY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges; HOOD, Chief District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Kevin R. Himebaugh, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellant. Paul D. Reingold, Michigan Clinical Law Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Kevin R. Himebaugh, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellant. Paul D. Reingold, Michigan Clinical Law Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellee.