United States Sixth Circuit
SUPERIOR BANK v. BOYD, 02-2330
Summary judgment in favor of defendant, avoiding plaintiff-bank's mortgage on his real property, is affirmed where plaintiff is not entitled to have its interest equitably subrogated to a prior recorded mortgage since it was negligent for the seven-month delay between the signing and the recording of the mortgage.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/16/2005
- Published 02/16/2005
Judges
- Before: GUY and SUTTON, Circuit Judges; CARR, Chief District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Walter J. Russell, Russell & Batchelor, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant. Kelly M. Hagan, Zimmerman, Kuhn, Darling, Boyd, Taylor & Quandt, Traverse City, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Walter J. Russell, Stephen C. Bransdorfer, Russell & Batchelor, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant. Kelly M. Hagan, Zimmerman, Kuhn, Darling, Boyd, Taylor & Quandt, Traverse City, Michigan, for Appellee.