Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


WILLIIAMS v. EAU CLAIRE PUB. SCH., 03-1486

In an employment discrimination suit, the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to give plaintiff's proffered jury instructions since the instructions do not correctly state the law as pronounced in St. Mary's v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993).

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/10/2005
  • Published 02/10/2005

Judges

  • Before:  MARTIN and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges;  JORDAN, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Judy E. Bregman, Bregman & Welch, Grand Haven, Michigan, for Appellant.  Mark T. Ostrowski, Kluczynski, Girtz & Vogelzang, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Judy E. Bregman, Bregman & Welch, Grand Haven, Michigan, for Appellant.  Robert F. Mirque, Jr., Kluczynski, Girtz & Vogelzang, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard