United States Sixth Circuit
MISKEL v. KARNES, 03-3426
Denial of plaintiff habeas petition is affirmed over her challenge to the presentation of expert testimony on whether the type of breath testing machine used to test plaintiff is generally reliable.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/24/2005
- Published 01/24/2005
Judges
- Before: KEITH, CLAY, and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Stephen E. Palmer, Yavitch & Palmer, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Lara N. Baker, City Prosecutor's Office for the City of Columbus, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Stephen E. Palmer, Yavitch & Palmer, Columbus, Ohio, R. William Meeks, Samuel H. Shamansky, Columbus, Ohio, David H. Thomas, Law Firm of R. William Meeks, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Lara N. Baker, City Prosecutor's Office for the City of Columbus, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees.