United States Sixth Circuit
DEAL v. HAMILTON COUNTY BD. OF EDUC., 03-5396
In a suit under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), alleging defendant failed to provide a "free and appropriate public education," the district court erred in finding that there had been no procedural or substantive violations of the IDEA.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/16/2004
- Published 12/16/2004
Judges
- Before: MOORE and COLE, Circuit Judges; MARBLEY, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Gary S. Mayerson, Mayerson & Associates, New York, New York, for Appellants. Charles L. Weatherly, the Weatherly Law Firm, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Gary S. Mayerson, Mayerson & Associates, New York, New York, Theodore R. Kern, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellants. Charles L. Weatherly, Thomas W. Dickson, Jennifer R. Fain, Kathleen A. Sullivan, the Weatherly Law Firm, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.