United States Sixth Circuit

The district court's imposition of an appeal bond on plaintiff, for her objections to a proposed settlement in an antitrust class action suit, is affirmed where the district court's calculation of the appeal bond was proper.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/14/2004
• Published 12/14/2004

Judges

• Before:  NORRIS and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges;  OLIVER, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Gordon Ball, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Paul F. Novak, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, Robert L. Hubbard, Director of Litigation, Antitrust Bureau, New York, New York, Albert L. Partee III, Office of the Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, Richard W. Cohen, Lowey, Dannenberg, Bemporad & Selinger, White Plains, New York, for Appellees., Paul F. Novak, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, Robert L. Hubbard, Director of Litigation, Antitrust Bureau, New York, New York, Albert L. Partee III, Office of the Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, Richard W. Cohen, Peter D. St. Phillip, Jr., Lowey, Dannenberg, Bemporad & Selinger, White Plains, New York, Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr., Berman, DeValerio, Pease, Tabacco, Burt & Pucillo, San Francisco, California, for Appellees.