United States Sixth Circuit

Summary judgment in favor of plaintiff's claim, alleging violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, is reversed where the district court erred in applying an abbreviated or "quick-look" analysis in its definition of the market for purposes of antitrust analysis.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/15/2004
• Published 11/15/2004

Judges

• Before:  BATCHELDER, GIBBONS, and COOK, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:Gregory L. Curtner, Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, Ann Arbor, MI, for Appellant. W.B. Markovits, Markovits & Greiwe, Cincinnati, OH, for Appellees. ON BRIEF:Gregory L. Curtner, Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, Ann Arbor, MI, James A. Wilson, Laura G. Kuykendall, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, OH, for Appellant. W.B. Markovits, Markovits & Greiwe, Stanley M. Chesley, Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley, Cincinnati, OH, for Appellees.