United States Sixth Circuit

Defendant's conviction for receiving child pornography is affirmed, however, his sentence is reversed where the district court applied the wrong sentencing guideline for conduct that did not amount to trafficking in child pornography.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/25/2004
• Published 10/25/2004

Judges

• Before:  KEITH, MARTIN, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Frank P. Campisano, Law Office of Frank Campisano, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant.  Monica Wheatley, Assistant United States Attorney, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Candace G. Hill, Terry M. Cushing, Assistant United States Attorneys, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellee.