United States Sixth Circuit
US v. HOPPER, 02-6122
Defendant's drug conviction is affirmed over his challenges that 1 )the district court erred in denying his motion for a new trial, 2) the jury instructions were erroneous, and 3) insufficient evidence supports his conviction.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/21/2004
- Published 09/21/2004
Judges
- Before: KEITH, MARTIN, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Paul W. Laymon, Jr. (argued and briefed), Asst. U.S. Attorney, Steven S. Neff, (argued), Asst. U.S. Attorney, Chattanooga, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Charles P. Dupree (argued and briefed), Chattanooga, TN, for Defendant-Appellant.