United States Sixth Circuit

Defendant's conviction is affirmed over his challenges that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective due to a conflict of interest and the trial court improperly decided not to investigate an allegation of a juror's bias.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/10/2004
• Published 09/10/2004

Judges

• Before: SILER, MOORE, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Max Kravitz (briefed), Kort W. Gatterdam (argued and briefed), Kravitz & Kravitz, Columbus, OH.


• For Appellees:
  
• Stuart A. Cole (argued and briefed), Asst. General Corrections Litigation Section, Columbus, OH, for Respondent.