United States Sixth Circuit

Jury verdict against plaintiff's claim of products liability is reversed where the district court erred 1) by refusing to instruct the jury about plaintiff's strict liability theory, and 2) in excluding evidence related to the functioning of a seatbelt.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/20/2004
• Published 08/20/2004

Judges

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel