United States Sixth Circuit

A jury verdict in favor of plaintiff on its negligence claims is affirmed and defendant's appeal, arguing that the district court erred in granting plaintiff's Rule 50 motion and in improperly instructing the jury, is denied.

Appellate Information

• Argued 03/11/2004
• Decided 08/04/2004
• Published 08/04/2004

Judges

• Before:  MARTIN and CLAY, Circuit Judges;  CUDAHY, Senior Circuit Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Jon R. Muth (argued and briefed), Susan G. Davis (briefed), Miller, Johnson, Snell & Cummiskey, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant., Thomas F. Koernke, Koernke & Compton, Grand Rapids, MI, for Defendant., Kathleen McCree Lewis (argued and briefed), Kyle R. Dufrane (briefed), Dykema Gossett, Detroit, MI, Richard G. Ward (briefed), Sullivan, Ward, Asher & Patton, Southfield, MI, for Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.