United States Sixth Circuit

In a conspiracy case, defendants' denial of a motion to suppress is affirmed because their Fourth Amendment rights were not violated due to the fact that sufficient reasonable suspicion was present to stop the vehicle they were driving, and defendants' subsequent detention did not constitute an arrest without probable cause.

Appellate Information

• Argued 06/18/2004
• Decided 07/26/2004
• Published 07/26/2004

Judges

• Before:  KENNEDY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges;  SHADUR, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• John B. Gibbons (argued and briefed), Cleveland, OH, for Anthony Jacob., Amy B. Cleary (argued), Michael G. Dane (briefed), Federal Public Defender's Office, Cleveland, OH, for Ramon Gallardo.


• For Appellees:
  
• Ronald B. Bakeman, Assistant United States Attorney (argued), Kenneth S. McHargh, Asst. U.S. Atty. (briefed), Cleveland, OH, for Appellee.