United States Sixth Circuit

District court did not err by granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment on the issues whether certain defendants were proper parties under the Video Privacy Protection Act and whether the plaintiff timely filed his claim within the two-year statute of limitations period.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/08/2004
• Published 07/08/2004

Judges

• Before MARTIN, CLAY, and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Alden J. Daniel (briefed), Jr., Wartburg, TN, pro se.


• For Appellees:
  
• D. Mitchell Bryant, M. Drew Robinson (briefed), Cleveland, TN, Russell S. Baldwin (briefed), Bass, Berry & Sims, Nashville, TN, Melinda Meador (briefed), Bass, Berry & Sims, Knoxville, TN, N. Mark Kinsman (briefed), Baker, Kinsman, Hollis, Clelland & Winer, Chattanooga, TN, Michael E. Jenne (briefed), Jenne, Scott & Jenne, Cleveland, TN, Martha A. Campbell (briefed), Office of the Attorney General, Nashville, TN, Kent E. Krause (briefed), Henry S. Queener III (briefed), Brewer, Krause & Brooks, Nashville, TN, for Appellees.