United States Sixth Circuit

Court granted defendant's motion to have government return seized property because lower court failed to rule on his initial motion. Defendant's conviction for stalking and upward sentence departure for psychological harm to the victim were affirmed.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/11/2004
• Published 06/11/2004

Judges

• Before MARTIN and CLAY, Circuit Judges;  MILLS, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Jay Milano (briefed), Milano & Co., Rocky River, OH, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Edward F. Feran (briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Cleveland, OH, for Appellee.