United States Sixth Circuit
US v. NAMEY, 02-4100
Conviction for willfully failing to pay support obligations for a child who resides in another state is affirmed. 18 U.S.C. section 228(a) is not unconstitutionally vague for failing to define "resides"; it would make no sense to read the statute as imposing the strict domicile test.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/15/2004
- Published 04/15/2004
Judges
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit