United States Sixth Circuit

Substantial evidence supports defendant's finding that plaintiff's anti-union animus motivated its decision to reduce employee bonuses. Plaintiff has not met its burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that it would have made the same decision regardless of the fact that its employees were engaged in protected activity.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/07/2004
• Published 01/07/2004

Judges

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel