Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


UNITED RENTALS (N. AM.), INC. v. KEIZER, 02-1580

Defendant did not violate the non-compete provisions of his employment agreement with plaintiff. For a competing business to "operate" in a proscribed geographic area, it must be physically located in that area; merely conducting business within the proscribed area is insufficient.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/07/2004
  • Published 01/07/2004

Judges

  • Before CLAY and COOK, Circuit Judges;  STAFFORD, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Robert H. Smeltzer (argued and briefed), Gerald Haberkorn (briefed), Lowis & Gellen, Chicago, IL, Harold E. Nelson (briefed), Borre, Peterson, Fowler & Reens, Grand Rapids, MI, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Steven C. Berry (argued and briefed), Bigler, Berry, Johnston, Sztykiel & Hunt, Zeeland, MI, Robert W. Smith (briefed), Silverman, Smith, Bingen & Rice, Kalamazoo, MI, for Appellees.
Copied to clipboard