United States Sixth Circuit
UNITED RENTALS (N. AM.), INC. v. KEIZER, 02-1580
Defendant did not violate the non-compete provisions of his employment agreement with plaintiff. For a competing business to "operate" in a proscribed geographic area, it must be physically located in that area; merely conducting business within the proscribed area is insufficient.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/07/2004
- Published 01/07/2004
Judges
- Before CLAY and COOK, Circuit Judges; STAFFORD, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Robert H. Smeltzer (argued and briefed), Gerald Haberkorn (briefed), Lowis & Gellen, Chicago, IL, Harold E. Nelson (briefed), Borre, Peterson, Fowler & Reens, Grand Rapids, MI, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Steven C. Berry (argued and briefed), Bigler, Berry, Johnston, Sztykiel & Hunt, Zeeland, MI, Robert W. Smith (briefed), Silverman, Smith, Bingen & Rice, Kalamazoo, MI, for Appellees.