Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. PAULINO, 01-6424

District court correctly dismissed conspirator's successive 28 U.S.C. section 2255 motion for failure to demonstrate the existence of a new rule of constitutional law.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/10/2003
  • Published 12/10/2003

Judges

  • Before BOGGS, Chief Judge;  SILER, Circuit Judges;  RICE, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Louis A. Chaiten (briefed), Geoffrey M. Johnson (briefed), Pearson N. Bownas (argued), Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Cleveland, OH, for Appellant., Juan Leonardo Paulino, Florence, CO, pro se., Jane E. Graham, (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Frances E. Catron (argued and briefed), U.S. Atty., Mason Moore Kessinger, Asst. U.S. Atty., U.S. Atty's Office, Lexington, KY, for U.S.

Copied to clipboard