United States Sixth Circuit
US v. DELGADO, JR., 01-2090/01-1009
In defendants' consolidated drug case, the random designation of alternate jurors at the end of the trial was inconsistent with Rule 24(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, but the violation did not affect defendants' substantial rights; accordingly defendants' claim of prejudicial error is rejected and affirmed.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/05/2003
- Published 12/05/2003
Judges
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit