United States Sixth Circuit

A district court order granting a city's motion to quash is affirmed where the court properly found that there were no factually intertwined issues to resolve, and neither the convenience of the litigants nor considerations of judicial economy justified the exercise of ancillary jurisdiction over a state law indemnity claim.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/14/2003
• Published 10/14/2003

Judges

• Before BATCHELDER and MOORE, Circuit Judges;  FORESTER, Chief District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David J. Nickola (argued and briefed), Nickola & Nickola, Flint, MI, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Patrick L. Rose (argued and briefed), Lansing, MI, for Appellees.