United States Sixth Circuit

The district court's decision as to liability and equitable allocation for response costs for cleanup in a CERCLA action is affirmed, but calculation of prejudgment interest under 42 U.S.C. section 9607(a) is remanded.

Appellate Information

• Argued 07/30/2003
• Decided 09/26/2003
• Published 09/26/2003

Judges

• Before:  DAUGHTREY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges, CALDWELL, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Martha E. Horvitz,Bricker & Eckler, Columbus, OH, Daniel M. Darragh (argued and briefed), Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, for Defendant-Appellee Consolidation Coal Company., Joseph D. Lonardo (briefed), Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee Triangle Wire & Cable, Inc., Richard S. Wiedman (briefed), Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, Pittsburgh, PA, Carol L. Press (briefed), Neil G. Epstein (argued and briefed), Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant-Appellant Neville Chemical Company.