United States Sixth Circuit
HOOD v. KELLER, 02-3402
The Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not bar plaintiff's claims alleging that Ohio permit requirements for use of statehouse grounds are unconstitutionally overbroad, vague, and discriminatory.
Appellate Information
- Argued 08/01/2003
- Decided 09/03/2003
- Published 09/03/2003
Judges
- Before KENNEDY, GILMAN, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Nathan W. Kellum (argued and briefed), Center for Inalienable Rights, Memphis, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Elise W. Porter (argued and briefed), David S. Timms, Peter M. Thomas, Office of Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, OH, Tomi L. Dorris (briefed), Office of Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, OH, for Defendants-Appellees.