Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


HOOD v. KELLER, 02-3402

The Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not bar plaintiff's claims alleging that Ohio permit requirements for use of statehouse grounds are unconstitutionally overbroad, vague, and discriminatory.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 08/01/2003
  • Decided 09/03/2003
  • Published 09/03/2003

Judges

  • Before KENNEDY, GILMAN, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Nathan W. Kellum (argued and briefed), Center for Inalienable Rights, Memphis, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Elise W. Porter (argued and briefed), David S. Timms, Peter M. Thomas, Office of Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, OH, Tomi L. Dorris (briefed), Office of Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, OH, for Defendants-Appellees.
Copied to clipboard