Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


MCKINNIE v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC., 02-3058

Plaintiffs had actual notice of defendant's pending summary judgment motion, and defendant did not have to notify plaintiffs of the requirements of FRCP 56(e), or inform plaintiffs of the consequences of failing to oppose a summary judgment motion.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 07/31/2003
  • Decided 08/18/2003
  • Published 08/18/2003

Judges

  • Before: KENNEDY, GILMAN, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Joseph K. Grant (argued and briefed), Saffold, Grant & Mason, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Charles J. French, III (briefed), Jeremy R. Sayre (argued and briefed), Baker & Hostetler, Cleveland, OH, Jack E. Peak, Roadway Express, Akron, OH, for Defendant-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard