United States Sixth Circuit

In appeals from bank fraud convictions under 18 U.S.C. section 1344, 1) evidence was sufficient to establish requisite intent, 2) refusal to award a reduction for acceptance of responsibility was not clear error, and 3) a restitution order was not plain error.

Appellate Information

• Argued 06/20/2003
• Decided 07/28/2003
• Published 07/28/2003

Judges

• Before KENNEDY and COLE, Circuit Judges;  WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Stephen L. Hiyama (argued and briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Richard B. Ginsberg (argued and briefed), Ann Arbor, MI, for Defendant-Appellant.