United States Sixth Circuit
LEPLEY v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEM. CO., 01-4304
Plaintiff failed to satisfy insurance policy requirements of providing prompt notice of her claim and protecting the insurer's rights to subrogation, and the fact that coverage arose by operation of law did not relieve plaintiff of the obligation to comply with notice and subrogation provisions.
Appellate Information
- Argued 03/14/2003
- Decided 06/30/2003
- Published 06/30/2003
Judges
- Before MOORE and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; COHN, Senior District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Kenneth L. Gibson (argued and briefed), Weick, Gibson & Lowry, Cuyahoga Falls, OH, Stanley P. Aronson (briefed), Aronson & Associates, Akron, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Larry C. Greathouse (briefed), Timothy John Fitzgerald (argued), Alton L. Stephens, Jr. (briefed), Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Cleveland, OH, David J. Fagnilli (argued and briefed), Davis & Young, Cleveland, OH, for Defendants-Appellees.