United States Sixth Circuit
LANIER v. BRYANT, 00-6408
The two-year limitation period expired before a federal prisoner's pro se action was brought under the Federal Wiretap Act, where information provided him with a "reasonable opportunity to discover the violation" under 18 U.S.C. section 2520(e). District court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to amend the complaint.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/17/2003
- Published 06/17/2003
Judges
- Before BATCHELDER and MOORE, Circuit Judges; FORESTER, Chief District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David W. Lanier (briefed), Lompoc, CA, pro se.
- For Appellees:
- Sidney P. Alexander (briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Memphis, TN, Mary M. Bers (briefed), Office of the Attorney General, Senior Counsel, Civil Rights and Claims Division, Nashville, TN, William N. Bates (briefed), James Russell Farrarr (briefed), Farrar & Bates, Nashville, TN, Joseph S. Ozment (briefed), Wampler, Pierce, Califf & Siegel, Memphis, TN, for Appellees.