United States Sixth Circuit

The district court did not err in concluding that decisions of the Michigan state courts were an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent as to juror challenges, under Batson and its progeny. Petitioner has not shown entitlement to review of a Doyle claim under the applicable standard.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/26/2003
• Published 03/26/2003

Judges

• Before:  COLE and CLAY, Circuit Judges;  BERTELSMAN, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Kenneth M. Mogill (argued and briefed), Mogill, Posner & Cohen, Lake Orion, MI, for Petitioner-Appellee., Brad H. Beaver (argued and briefed), Office of the Attorney General, Habeas Corpus Division, Lansing, MI, for Respondent-Appellant.