United States Sixth Circuit
US v. FOREMAN, 01-3892
Defendant's right to the effective assistance of counsel was not violated, as a decision not to call certain witnesses and police officers to testify was a reasonable trial strategy. A purported lack of belief in a client cannot constitute a conflict of interest.
Appellate Information
- Argued 02/04/2003
- Decided 03/25/2003
- Published 03/25/2003
Judges
- Before GILMAN and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; POLSTER, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Brenda S. Shoemaker (argued and briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Frederick D. Benton, Jr. (argued and briefed), Columbus, OH, for Defendant-Appellant.