Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. FOREMAN, 01-3892

Defendant's right to the effective assistance of counsel was not violated, as a decision not to call certain witnesses and police officers to testify was a reasonable trial strategy. A purported lack of belief in a client cannot constitute a conflict of interest.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 02/04/2003
  • Decided 03/25/2003
  • Published 03/25/2003

Judges

  • Before GILMAN and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges;  POLSTER, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Brenda S. Shoemaker (argued and briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Frederick D. Benton, Jr. (argued and briefed), Columbus, OH, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard