United States Sixth Circuit

A factfinder could reasonably conclude that an attempted distribution offense had its beginnings and subsequent negotiations in Tennessee, so that venue was proper there, and there was no plain error in government's cross-examination of defendant.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/21/2003
• Published 03/21/2003

Judges

• Before: MOORE and GILMAN, Circuit Judges;  ROSEN, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Thomas L. Parker (argued and briefed), Asst. U.S. Attorney, Memphis, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Thomas Edwards Hansom (argued and briefed), Law Offices of Thomas E. Hansom, Memphis, TN, for Defendant-Appellant.