Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


TRZEBUCKOWSKI v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, 01-3509

In an appeal of a city ordinance unconstitutionally applied to plaintiff and his business, because related charges against plaintiff were dismissed, and he did not file a timely appeal, plaintiff's claims were time barred, even under a "continuing violations" of his rights theory.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/14/2003
  • Published 02/14/2003

Judges

  • Before GUY, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Terry H. Gilbert (argued and briefed), Friedman & Gilbert, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Thomas L. Anastos (argued), Keith Hansbrough (briefed), Matthew T. Brady, City of Cleveland Law Department, Office of Director of Law, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellee City of Cleveland., Matthew T. Brady, City of Cleveland Law Department, Office of Director of Law, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellee Lauren C. Moore.
Copied to clipboard