United States Sixth Circuit
TRZEBUCKOWSKI v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, 01-3509
In an appeal of a city ordinance unconstitutionally applied to plaintiff and his business, because related charges against plaintiff were dismissed, and he did not file a timely appeal, plaintiff's claims were time barred, even under a "continuing violations" of his rights theory.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/14/2003
- Published 02/14/2003
Judges
- Before GUY, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Terry H. Gilbert (argued and briefed), Friedman & Gilbert, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Thomas L. Anastos (argued), Keith Hansbrough (briefed), Matthew T. Brady, City of Cleveland Law Department, Office of Director of Law, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellee City of Cleveland., Matthew T. Brady, City of Cleveland Law Department, Office of Director of Law, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellee Lauren C. Moore.