United States Sixth Circuit

In an Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim, decision makers' statements evinced discriminatory intent, and where the factfinder decides to draw the same-actor inference, it is insufficient to warrant summary judgment for the defendant if the employee has otherwise raised a genuine issue of material fact.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/27/2003
• Published 01/27/2003

Judges

• Before MARTIN, Chief Circuit Judge;  KRUPANSKY, BOGGS, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Louis A. Jacobs (argued), Columbus, OH, for Appellant., John S. Marshall (briefed), Columbus, OH, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• James E. Davidson (argued and briefed), Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn, Columbus, OH, for Appellee.