United States Sixth Circuit

An ERISA plan administrator's determination, that claims for benefits by an employee performing supplemental work arose out of an "occupation or employment for wage or profit," was rational and is neither arbitrary or capricious.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/10/2003
• Published 01/10/2003

Judges

• Before KENNEDY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges;  SARGUS, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Randolph B. Osstyn (argued and briefed), Osstyn, Bays, Ferns & Quinnell, Marquette, MI, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Douglas M. Feldman, Alan M. Levy (argued and briefed), Lindner & Marsack, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for Defendants-Appellees.