Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Sixth Circuit


RITCHIE v. ROGERS, 01-3737

State courts' denial of a habeas petitioner's motion for change of venue and rejection of objections, based on impact of pre-trial publicity, to a switch from individual voir dire to group voir dire, did not result in a decision that was contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/18/2002
  • Published 12/18/2002

Judges

  • Before: KENNEDY and MOORE, Circuit Judges;  DOWD, Senior District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • David H. Bodiker (briefed), Theresa G. Haire (argued and briefed), Public Defender's Office, Ohio Public Defender Commission, Columbus, OH, for Petitioner-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • M. Scott Criss (argued and briefed), Office of the Attorney General, Corrections Litigation Section, Columbus, OH, for Respondent-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard