United States Sixth Circuit
RITCHIE v. ROGERS, 01-3737
State courts' denial of a habeas petitioner's motion for change of venue and rejection of objections, based on impact of pre-trial publicity, to a switch from individual voir dire to group voir dire, did not result in a decision that was contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/18/2002
- Published 12/18/2002
Judges
- Before: KENNEDY and MOORE, Circuit Judges; DOWD, Senior District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David H. Bodiker (briefed), Theresa G. Haire (argued and briefed), Public Defender's Office, Ohio Public Defender Commission, Columbus, OH, for Petitioner-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- M. Scott Criss (argued and briefed), Office of the Attorney General, Corrections Litigation Section, Columbus, OH, for Respondent-Appellee.