United States Sixth Circuit
US v. RISTOVSKI, 01-1747
Retroactive application of amended Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure did not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause, thus the district court's determination that a motion for new trial was untimely is affirmed.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/04/2002
- Published 12/04/2002
Judges
- Before BOGGS and COLE, Circuit Judges; BELL, Chief District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Ross I. MacKenzie (argued and briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Harold Z. Gurewitz (argued and briefed), Gurewitz & Raben, Detroit, MI, for Defendant-Appellant.