Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. RISTOVSKI, 01-1747

Retroactive application of amended Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure did not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause, thus the district court's determination that a motion for new trial was untimely is affirmed.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/04/2002
  • Published 12/04/2002

Judges

  • Before BOGGS and COLE, Circuit Judges;  BELL, Chief District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Ross I. MacKenzie (argued and briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Harold Z. Gurewitz (argued and briefed), Gurewitz & Raben, Detroit, MI, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard