United States Sixth Circuit

Where evidence reasonably goes to the issue of a rape victim's consent, as well as her motive in pursuing charges, a habeas petitioner's constitutional right of confrontation has been violated through the exclusion of that evidence.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/07/2002
• Published 10/07/2002

Judges

• Before BOGGS and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges;  STEEH, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Kirk A. Migdal (argued and briefed), Akron, OH, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Mark Joseph Zemba (argued and briefed), Office of the Attorney General, Corrections Litigation Section, Cleveland, OH, for Appellees.