Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. TOWNSEND, 00-4608

Police officers lacked reasonable suspicion to detain defendants until a canine unit arrived, based on a combination of factors before the officers, thus counterfeit bills seized in the officers' search of defendants' trunk were properly suppressed.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 04/24/2002
  • Decided 09/27/2002
  • Published 09/27/2002

Judges

  • Before KRUPANSKY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges;  and LAWSON, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • David J. Horne (argued and briefed), U.S. Attorney Office, Dayton, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Kevin M. Schad (argued and briefed), Schad & Cook, Indian Springs, OH, Lawrence J. Greger (briefed), Greger & Ovington, Dayton, OH, Sharon L. Ovington (argued), Greger & Ovington, Dayton, OH, for Defendants-Appellees.
Copied to clipboard