United States Sixth Circuit
US v. TOWNSEND, 00-4608
Police officers lacked reasonable suspicion to detain defendants until a canine unit arrived, based on a combination of factors before the officers, thus counterfeit bills seized in the officers' search of defendants' trunk were properly suppressed.
Appellate Information
- Argued 04/24/2002
- Decided 09/27/2002
- Published 09/27/2002
Judges
- Before KRUPANSKY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges; and LAWSON, District Judge.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David J. Horne (argued and briefed), U.S. Attorney Office, Dayton, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Kevin M. Schad (argued and briefed), Schad & Cook, Indian Springs, OH, Lawrence J. Greger (briefed), Greger & Ovington, Dayton, OH, Sharon L. Ovington (argued), Greger & Ovington, Dayton, OH, for Defendants-Appellees.