United States Sixth Circuit

District court erred in finding that it did not have jurisdiction to hear plaintiff's motion brought under Rule 60(b)(5), seeking to enjoin defendant from allegedly violating the terms of a 1972 judgment which provided a method for ensuring that construction bonds would be paid.

Appellate Information

• Argued 05/01/2002
• Decided 09/19/2002
• Published 09/19/2002

Judges

• Before SILER and CLAY, Circuit Judges;  OBERDORFER, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Philip A. Grashoff, Jr. (argued and briefed), Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett, Grand Rapids, MI, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• G. Thomas Johnson, Parmenter O'Toole (argued and briefed), Muskegon, MI, for Appellee.