Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Sixth Circuit


NEW PAR v. CITY OF SAGINAW, 01-2083

Denial of a zoning variance for construction of a cellular tower was not supported by substantial evidence, and violated the Telecommunications Act of 1996 where the denial was not in writing.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/14/2002
  • Published 08/14/2002

Judges

  • Before DAUGHTREY and MOORE, Circuit Judges;  STAFFORD, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Zora E. Johnson (argued and briefed), Dykema Gossett, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Thomas H. Fancher (argued and briefed), Saginaw, MI, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard