United States Sixth Circuit

An ambulance company's claim, that a suspension from receiving 911 emergency dispatches from the city was a deprivation of property and liberty without due process, is not actionable where 1) claimant did not possess a property interest in receiving 911 calls, and 2) no liberty interest was implicated absent a loss of business opportunity or damage to reputation.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/12/2002
• Published 07/12/2002

Judges

• Before:  MOORE and COLE, Circuit Judges;  TARNOW, District Judge.

Court

• United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Steven B. Winters (argued), Cline, Cook & Weisenburger, Toledo, OH, James P. Silk, Jr. (briefed), Spengler, Nathanson P.L.L., Toledo, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Anthony L. Geiger (argued and briefed), Law Director, Lima, OH, for Defendants-Appellees.