Skip to main content

United States Sixth Circuit


US v. HOPKINS, 00-6032

District court did not err in admitting defendant's statements concerning drug quantities, in determining his offense conduct under the USSG; any misapprehension of the governing statutory penalty range did not affect selection of the sentence imposed, and was harmless error.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/02/2002
  • Published 07/02/2002

Judges

  • Before MARTIN, Chief Circuit Judge;  SILER and CLAY, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Sixth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Stephen B. Shankman (argued and briefed), Office of the Federal Public Defender for the Western District of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Thomas L. Parker (briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen P. Hall, Assistant United States Attorney, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard