United States Sixth Circuit
US v. HOPKINS, 00-6032
District court did not err in admitting defendant's statements concerning drug quantities, in determining his offense conduct under the USSG; any misapprehension of the governing statutory penalty range did not affect selection of the sentence imposed, and was harmless error.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/02/2002
- Published 07/02/2002
Judges
- Before MARTIN, Chief Circuit Judge; SILER and CLAY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Sixth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Stephen B. Shankman (argued and briefed), Office of the Federal Public Defender for the Western District of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Thomas L. Parker (briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen P. Hall, Assistant United States Attorney, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.